El propio movimiento de la Cultura Libre, no está exento de freeriders. Gente que obtiene de un bien común más de lo que aporta.
Tras once años de trabajo creando en silencio (y rodeado de incompresión) cosas como ourproject.org y kune.ourproject.org aparece un consorcio que usa tu trabajo y tus ideas sin dar el suficiente crédito ni involucrarte (ni a ti ni a tu asociación), para obtener ayudas de la UE y continuar con tu trabajo. O eso parece…
Así que me tuve que escribir un correo del «yo, yo, yo, yo, yo» y que refleja un poco lo difícil que es contribuir al bien común cuando la mayoría de la gente a tu alrededor está enfocada en su interés personal. El «sálvese quien pueda» vamos…
Leer entre líneas.
Hi there, First of all congratulations for the EU funds. I didn't know the existence of this list until this week, when Samer mentioned it. Later, but here we are. Let me introduce myself in a way that I usually don't do, but well, maybe the moment merits the effort. Sincerely, I like to work more than to talk about my work (or to talk about the work of others). I prefer that people talk about me, than to talk about myself and I prefer to be in the background as Javier de la Cueva says [1]. But let me use "I" today instead of "we" something that I use normally for my work in our Comunes Association. Also let me try to make a exercise of parrhesia. I founded ourproject.org in 2002 with the idea of spread the philosophy of Free Software in other areas of our society by providing free tools to any project/group/topic. Something similar to the tools and philosophy of the collaboration in Free Software projects but open the spectrum to any kind of free cultural projects. That is: forges/incubators of free culture production. At the beginning ourproject.org was only a simple manifest [2][3] that I've wrote with the feedback of my personal friends because in that time I didn't know anybody working in this area. So I've added all my friends that contributed with feedback in the credits also with the idea of maintain myself in the background. I think that these kind of citizen efforts should be done in a collaborative and collective way, with rotatory spokesmen, etc. but this not always works as you expected. After some feedback of my friends (mainly, "show us something more than text") I mounted our current website [4] using the codebase of sourceforge.net (the bigger forge/factory of Free Software in that moment) but adapting its code to any kind of project/area and any public (2002-2003). The main idea was basic: to allow the join of people with the same interests, to facilitate the collaborative online work of that groups, with the only condition that all the work should be free/libre/open to the rest of the world. A simple definition of Free Software methodology I like to use. That was also my main personal motivation (to work collaborative in other areas of my interest with my non tech collectives as I was convinced that the current economic paradigm was unsustainable). In that moment I was using the term "free project" [5] to describe this kind of peer production. Also I developed a GNU/Linux distro [6] (2003) allowing anyone to install a similar site and connect with other similar initiatives. In that distro I developed a plugin to make some kind of simple federation allowing the search of users/projects in that federation of free culture factory sites. This distro was used by some Spanish administration (in Extremadura) and some other organization. So the idea was to decentralize, to make an ecosystem of free cultural forges, a network of libraries/factories of self producing free culture [6]. In 2004, in the World Social Forum of India I was making somehow of spreading of that distribution, and people of FSF India proposed to Richard Stallman a meeting with me. After explaining the initiative RMS show me very interest (calling that initiative a Social forge) and afterwards he did some effort to transform savannah.gnu.org in something not only related with software but free culture. Savannah is/was using the same codebase that ourproject.org, but only oriented to Free Software. But the admins and maintainers of savannah didn't collaborate (I think that in that moment didn't understand the proposal). I have archived all these personal emails if someone is curious. In 2005, and after the usability problems that normal people was suffering in ourproject.org and with the experience of the daily use of ourproject.org in my own (non tech) collectives I decide to develop a new free project initiative. Kune was borning [7][8]. I've started choosing what technology, languages, and protocols I'll use, making some prototypes (in the beginning using Rails, and other frameworks). In the end of 2006 I left my work in Telefónica R&D to develop kune in full time using my savings for several years and focusing in coding and not worrying so much in the funds. I funded myself. At the beginning (Jan 2007) the World Social Forum international committee was interested in kune [9], and together with a good friend of the Ministry of Culture of Brazil (MinC), Jéferson Assumção, we tried to find funds and help from the MinC. We were a small team with three legs: public administration, social movements and free software community. It was too early and we didn't received funds because our software in that moment was not ready and because of other internal problems in the MinC (a strike that was paralyzing the Ministry). In that moment, the first version of kune was developed thanks to the help of Daniel Gómez Matas (@xdanigbx) who help me to put the foundations of the actual kune codebase, and also to develop the chat that we use in kune (the emite project [10]). Emite is something we develop as a standalone different project to kune to allow more contributions. But Dani couldn't continue contributing without incomes and as a voluntary. In that time Java and GWT was just released as Free Software and I was newbie to both. So I appreciate a lot Dani's teachings, help and geniality in that initial moment. In 2009 I had an almost usable version of kune [11], so Samer (who started to collaborate on this project) and me contacted again to RMS to try to receive some help of the FSF and also to start to search for collaborations in the Free Software community. One month later Google presented Google Wave (our collaborative real-time editor and Inbox), and we stopped the spreading of our work in the Free Software community as kune was so related with Wave work. For me and Dani the tech original goal was to use our chat library (based in XMPP) to allow collaborative real-time editing in our own editor. But the work of Google was amazing, and they promised to open it, so I almost stopped to develop the kune core until the release of wave. Without knowing which part of the code were gonna be released I didn't want to do double work. Meanwhile, I developed troco.ourproject.org, a P2P currency on top of Wave (inspired in a old decentralized P2P Japanese currency), plantare.ourproject.org (a similar paper based P2P currency for seeds interchange), massmob.ourproject.org (our current event gadget in kune inspired in a talk with my friend Jéferson Assumção), and karma.ourproject.org, a reputation system also in top of Google Wave with the idea of integrate it with troco and on top of kune in some future point. They were some ideas difficult to implement before Wave, but with wave API were a more easy tasks. At the end of 2010 Google Wave was released as a free software as Apache Wave, so, I've started to integrate its codebase in the codebase of kune. My initials decisions about technologies, protocols and languages chosen for kune were the same as Apache Wave, so the integration was, not straightforward, but very possible after some weeks of work. Wave was for us like a big big gift. Currently I'm a committer of Apache Wave [12], but my contributions and knowledge are minimal comparing with the effort and the incredible work that Google workers did with that project. I think that the part more unstable/unreliable of Wave are the parts not released by Google (search/indexing, persistence of data, accounts and other Google infrastructure). The substitute parts of this proprietary software was only a starting and examples that should be reimplemented. This should be improved but it's not straightforward. Also Wave is the most complex part of the code, I think. In the Free Software community we like to "show the code": Kune has 238.000 lines of code, emite, our chat, 110.000 (and Wave has 244.000) aprox. I'm not counting other minor subprojects I've developed (troco, that we are currently reimplementing, karma, massmob, etc). Without design voluntaries (now they are arriving) I also did all the amateur graphic works of all the projects (styles, logos, icons, presentations, tutorials, videos, etc). Sorry for that amateur work, but I did my best During that developing process we tried to find some other funds without success. So I keep developing alone. As kune is so big, this is the cause of be also so buggy/unfinished: Too much work for only one person that also have to maintain, almost alone, all the hardware infrastructure of these initiatives. It's difficult to find voluntaries to this work because it's not an easy and visible task. Fortunately the other projects (emite and wave) have more contributors, but, they need also help. I hope these explanations clarify why kune in not yet so reliable. In the last two years, a foundation (IEPALA) contract me to install and improve its social network for NGOs in Latin America based in kune [13]. But having funds only for one person, this not improved the situation of the development process, only my personal economy. Some of the options I've tried/proposed was to divide my monthly 1200€ wage in two parts so other interested developer could help me. But it didn't prosper. Now with the current economic situation in Spain, and without public funds, IEPALA has a layoff process with 50% of reduction of the wages to all the employers. So after so much time developing alone (with the initial and essential help of Dani Gómez), with small contributions of a pair of new developers starting to arrive these later months, and things like this UE project, I'm happy to see that, finally, seems that our work is compressible, and can be potentially useful for our society in this difficult moment. Thanks to Samer with that communication and fund effort. Personally, I'm also happy to see that I'll receive some help in the development process. After six years of developing alone (I never did in my live any similar effort as big as this one) and without a month of holidays since my Telefónica R&D work at the end of 2006, sincerely, I need some rest. This history, during all these years since 2002, was not always easy or beautiful. Some people and organizations were always there trying to make business with our common good and not always very honestly, acting sometimes as a kind of free riders. Fortunately there are some friends here and there helping honestly since the beginning as my good friend Jéferson Assumção mentioned above, now Vice-Secretary of Culture of Rio Grande do Sul. We try to maintain our credits [14] very updated. If someone is interested in my professional CV, I've just uploaded it to some public place [15]. It's a little bit outdated, but as we said before, to talk about me or my work it's something I don't do normally. For professional references, you can contact the brother of Juan Pavón (Luis Pavón), my boss in Telefónica R&D, and one of my preferred bosses in all my professional career. What a coincidence. As you can understand from the previous description I'm not specially interested in these funds, only in how this UE project can help to make kune not a "one developer project", how to make that the money don't change the voluntary nature of this developing effort, and the main goal, how to make this common effort really useful for our society. Finally, after this is official, we'll be great that someone write some email to [email protected] (a list with the people more involved nowadays in kune, including Samer and me). Thanks for the effort with this initiative, and again congrats. Sorry for my English and for this improvised "big-ego" email. Now I'll return to the background. BR,-- Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado http://comunes.org http://ourproject.org http://homes.ourproject.org/~vjrj/blog (@vjrj) "Either you're part of the problem or you're part of the solution or you're just part of the landscape." [Robert De Niro as Sam in Ronin (1998)] [1] http://derecho-internet.org/node/398 English: http://bit.ly/17YeVfg [2] http://ourproject.org/old/web2/en/manif.html [3] http://ourproject.org/docman/view.php/1/19/file19.html [4] http://ourproject.org/old/web4/ [5] http://libreprojects.ourproject.org/article.php3?id_article=15 [6] http://libreprojects.ourproject.org/article.php3?id_article=8 [7] http://bit.ly/10DmCKi English: http://bit.ly/17kTvup [8] http://bit.ly/12owc0B English: http://bit.ly/ZwvS10 [9] http://kune.ourproject.org/es/kune-y-el-fsm/ [10] https://github.com/EmiteGWT https://github.com/EmiteGWT?tab=members [11] http://kune.ourproject.org/es/2009/01/status-jan09/ (using Gilberto Gil free music) [12] https://reviews.apache.org/users/vjrj/ [13] http://social.gloobal.net [14] https://gitorious.org/kune/trunk/blobs/master/CREDITS [15] http://homes.ourproject.org/~vjrj/otros/vjrj_en.pdf (thanks to Samer for providing me the CV template)
Update (Ago-2013): Some months later, this happened (also affects the same project but with Bauwens and the P2P Foundation as the victims): http://p2pfoundation.net/Statement_of_Separation_with_Franco_Iacomella http://p2pfoundation.net/Stealing_Social_Capital_as_a_Crime_for_the_P2P_Era
Sin comentarios